Acute Coronary Syndrome
Cross-source consensus on Acute Coronary Syndrome from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- ACS occurred in 13 of the 280 analysed patients. — Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care
- All three evaluated tools failed to show reliable discrimination for ACS in this sample. — Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care
- NTS identified all ACS cases, while MHS and INTERCHEST each missed 2 of 13 ACS cases. — Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care
- ACS was one of the primary reference outcomes assessed within 6 weeks. — Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care
- Other strategies using point-of-care troponin testing or ECG may improve accuracy but are unavailable during initial telephone triage. — Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST score for telephone triage of acute chest pain: a prospective, diagnostic accuracy study in out-of-hours primary care