Aetiology Preferences
Cross-source consensus on Aetiology Preferences from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Most respondents would find a generic bacterial test useful even without Gram-positive versus Gram-negative differentiation. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Sample sizes were too small to support subgroup analyses of inflammatory test preferences. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Generic inflammatory testing was considered useful for clinicians diagnosing children where Kawasaki disease was on the differential, especially alongside a Kawasaki disease-specific test. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- The study found no evidence of bacterial test preference differences across emergency status, training status, experience level, or work setting. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Evidence of a difference between Greek and non-Greek respondents was not confirmed in a combined ordinal regression model. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe