Anthropometric Indices
Cross-source consensus on Anthropometric Indices from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Birth weight alone is insufficient for identifying fetal nutritional status. — Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study
- Anthropometric indices can help assess intrauterine growth but may fail to detect soft tissue depletion. — Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study
- The study compared CAN score against birth weight, length, head circumference, mid-arm circumference, ponderal index, MAC/HC ratio, BMI, and birth size standards. — Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study
- Newborns with fetal malnutrition had significantly lower average anthropometric values than newborns without fetal malnutrition, except length was not significantly different. — Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study
- Ponderal index reflects newborn thinness, but thinness does not necessarily mean pathological wasting. — Detection of fetal malnutrition at birth using clinical assessment of nutritional status (CAN) score and anthropometric indices and its associated risk factors among term newborns in southern Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study