Aphasia
Cross-source consensus on Aphasia from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Risks & contraindications
Highlighted claims
- A PPI partner with lived experience of stroke and aphasia, representing the Cyprus Stroke Association, contributed to developing the research topic and planning dissemination strategies. — Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol
- The PAOLI framework is used to support meaningful and independent involvement of people with aphasia in the review process. — Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol
- Meaningful PPI in stroke and aphasia research can require additional resources such as communication support, accessible materials, specialist facilitation, and time for relationship-building. — Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol
- Communication accessibility needs for people with aphasia may require aphasia-friendly materials, assistive communication technologies, specialist facilitation, adapted meeting formats, and additional time. — Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol
- Problems related to under-documented PPI costs can be amplified for people with aphasia after stroke. — Mapping the direct and indirect costs of patient and public involvement (PPI) in stroke and aphasia research: a scoping review protocol