Appointment Length and Quality
Cross-source consensus on Appointment Length and Quality from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- Most participants described virtual appointments as shorter and more rushed than in-person appointments, with some calls limited to around 10 or 15 minutes. — Learning from patients about their experiences with early adoption of virtual care appointments in primary care in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
- The narrow, problem-focused structure of virtual appointments risked missing abnormal test results, emerging concerns, or whole-person context. — Learning from patients about their experiences with early adoption of virtual care appointments in primary care in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
- Patients disliked that virtual appointments often focused narrowly on one problem rather than allowing discussion of broader health issues as in in-person visits. — Learning from patients about their experiences with early adoption of virtual care appointments in primary care in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
- Shorter appointments are associated with inappropriate prescribing, lower satisfaction, and reduced care quality, though they may not be inferior for every patient or situation. — Learning from patients about their experiences with early adoption of virtual care appointments in primary care in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study