Automated Monitoring Tools
Cross-source consensus on Automated Monitoring Tools from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- ODDPub was used for scalable automated data and code screening, but its reported sensitivity was 73%. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement
- ODDPub's sensitivity means false negatives are possible in data and code availability estimates. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement
- Automated institutional monitoring tools similar to EU TrialsTracker could help improve transparency practices at scale. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement
- The study used automated tools to assess registrations, summary results, data and code statements, open access, mapping, and statistical analysis. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement