Best-Worst Scaling
Cross-source consensus on Best-Worst Scaling from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
How it works
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Standardized BWS scores range from −1.0 (least reflective) to +1.0 (most reflective), with 0 indicating indifference. — Physician beliefs regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a large multihospital US healthcare system: a cross-sectional survey study
- BWS scores were calculated using a count method and confirmed with conditional logistic regression. — Physician beliefs regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a large multihospital US healthcare system: a cross-sectional survey study
- This study is the first of its kind to validate survey-derived belief scores against observed real-world prescribing rates. — Physician beliefs regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a large multihospital US healthcare system: a cross-sectional survey study
- Best-worst scaling offers an advantage over Likert scales by forcing respondents to differentiate between beliefs that might otherwise receive similar ratings. — Physician beliefs regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a large multihospital US healthcare system: a cross-sectional survey study