Biomechanical Reporting
Cross-source consensus on Biomechanical Reporting from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Benefits
Preparation
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Instrumented studies used inconsistent methods and reporting. — Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review
- Future instrumented studies should report technical details such as marker strategy, coordinate systems, rotation sequence, filtering, gait events, and symmetry metrics. — Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review
- Variable adherence to International Society of Biomechanics recommendations limited comparability across studies. — Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review
- Prosthetic components, socket-mounted markers, and residual limb segment definitions can strongly influence motion estimates. — Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review
- ISB-aligned reporting checklists and shared datasets would improve reproducibility and secondary synthesis. — Assessment of pain and functional outcomes after lower limb amputation: a scoping review