Children's Ability to Assess Treatment Claims
Cross-source consensus on Children's Ability to Assess Treatment Claims from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Correct response percentages varied widely across iCLAIM questions. — Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test
- The average percentage of correct responses per child was 45.8%. — Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test
- A passing score was defined as at least 13 correct answers out of 24, and 36.9% of children achieved it. — Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test
- A mastery score was defined as at least 20 correct answers out of 24, and 3.5% of children achieved it. — Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test
- Fewer than 40% of participating children showed basic IHC Key Concept knowledge, and fewer than 4% showed clear knowledge. — Test to assess claims about treatment effects for Spanish primary school children: the development process and cross-sectional validation study of the test