Clinical Practice Guideline Development
Cross-source consensus on Clinical Practice Guideline Development from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Highlighted claims
- Even when evidence on values and preferences exists, panels must interpret it by considering risk of bias, consistency, directness to the decision, and applicability to the target population. — Development of an educational video to support guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences into recommendation-making: qualitative one-on-one interviews and brainstorming meetings
- Guideline panels frequently lack the time and resources to conduct large primary studies such as patient surveys. — Development of an educational video to support guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences into recommendation-making: qualitative one-on-one interviews and brainstorming meetings
- In practice, guideline panels may rely on small patient focus groups or discussions among clinical experts as feasible but limited alternatives to primary evidence. — Development of an educational video to support guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences into recommendation-making: qualitative one-on-one interviews and brainstorming meetings
- Unstructured discussion of patient values issues in guideline panels can be difficult, and panels may struggle to reach consensus. — Development of an educational video to support guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences into recommendation-making: qualitative one-on-one interviews and brainstorming meetings