Clinical Trial Unit Emissions
Cross-source consensus on Clinical Trial Unit Emissions from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- Staff commuting contributed less than 2% of CTU module emissions because most staff use carbon-free or low-carbon transport modes. — Assessing the carbon footprint of French academic clinical trials using the NIHR method
- CTU emissions in both trials were primarily driven by heating and electricity consumption, which are difficult to address in the short term within existing facilities. — Assessing the carbon footprint of French academic clinical trials using the NIHR method
- Most CTU staff commute by cycling, walking, or public transit, leaving limited potential for additional emissions reduction through commuting interventions. — Assessing the carbon footprint of French academic clinical trials using the NIHR method
- Nantes University Hospital's planned 2027 office move is expected to reduce energy consumption by one-third through adoption of innovative energy-efficient technologies. — Assessing the carbon footprint of French academic clinical trials using the NIHR method