Clinician Adoption
Cross-source consensus on Clinician Adoption from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Other
Highlighted claims
- Clinicians valued risk ratios, medication cost information, and access to supporting evidence. — Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA
- Clinicians viewed familiar and intuitive interface design as reducing the learning burden. — Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA
- Embedded references increased clinician confidence by showing the source of the evidence. — Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA
- Education and reminders were considered necessary for clinician adoption. — Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA
- Scope-of-practice limits reduced DDInteract’s perceived utility for some nurses and clinicians under collaborative practice agreements. — Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA
- Clinicians worried that medication changes could conflict with other prescribers’ decisions. — Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug–drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA