Clinician Scepticism
Cross-source consensus on Clinician Scepticism from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
How it works
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- Participants overwhelmingly identified clinician scepticism as the origin of their self-doubt. — Sources and consequences of self-doubt in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a qualitative study in Europe and North America
- The study distinguishes legitimate clinical doubt from medical gaslighting, which participants defined as deliberate manipulative invalidation. — Sources and consequences of self-doubt in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a qualitative study in Europe and North America
- The authority gap between patients and clinicians made clinician doubt especially corrosive to patient self-belief. — Sources and consequences of self-doubt in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a qualitative study in Europe and North America
- Repeated clinician disbelief led patients to absorb that disbelief as their own. — Sources and consequences of self-doubt in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a qualitative study in Europe and North America
- Participants accepted that some clinician doubt can be legitimate and necessary for evidence-based medicine. — Sources and consequences of self-doubt in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a qualitative study in Europe and North America
- Neurologists were most often described as dismissive, followed by cardiologists. — Sources and consequences of self-doubt in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a qualitative study in Europe and North America