Clinician Subgroups
Cross-source consensus on Clinician Subgroups from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Subgroup analyses showed strong agreement in relative use-case rankings across clinician groups. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Two statistical modelling approaches supported the main subgroup findings. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Emergency clinicians scored paediatric use cases lower on average than other clinicians. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Clinicians with more than 20 years of experience scored adult use cases higher than less experienced clinicians. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- There was weak evidence that work setting was associated with adult scores. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe