Cluster-Specific Depression Risk

Cross-source consensus on Cluster-Specific Depression Risk from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Risks & contraindications

Cluster 2 had significantly higher adjusted odds of screening positive for depression than Cluster 1. — Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study
Cluster 3 had the highest depression risk and more than twice the odds of screening positive compared with Cluster 1. — Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study
Cluster 1 was the socioeconomically disadvantaged rural male reference group. — Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study
Clusters 4 and 5 were not significantly associated with depression. — Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study
Cluster 5 was described as the most structurally advantaged group but did not have a statistically significant depression association. — Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study