Co-Design Facilitators
Cross-source consensus on Co-Design Facilitators from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- All 10 facilitators involved in leading ALERT co-design activities agreed to participate in the interview study. — Facilitators’ experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study
- Facilitators were central to trust-building, rapport, conflict resolution, equal collaboration, and reducing power struggles in co-design. — Facilitators’ experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study
- Facilitators often held multiple responsibilities across research, workshops, quality improvement, training, and mentorship. — Facilitators’ experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study
- Facilitators’ roles as researchers, trainers, or clinical experts could make participants uneasy and inhibit disclosure. — Facilitators’ experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study
- Facilitators’ involvement in both co-design and competency-based training helped them incorporate stakeholder concerns into training content. — Facilitators’ experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study
- Some clinically trained facilitators intervened during labour when patients appeared neglected, mistreated, or in worsening situations, but this risked changing their facilitator position and staff trust. — Facilitators’ experiences of co-designing an intrapartum care intervention in four sub-Saharan African countries: a qualitative study