Controlled Interrupted Time Series
Cross-source consensus on Controlled Interrupted Time Series from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Each evaluated Wave 2 intervention was compared with a unique synthetic control group made from non-targeted elective interventions. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- The controlled interrupted time series tested for monthly count changes after Wave 2 guidance. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- Negative February 2022 prediction values were interpreted as evidence consistent with de-implementation after accounting for broad pandemic effects. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- The synthetic control pool excluded EBI Wave 1 interventions, Wave 2 interventions, substitutes, and cancer-related treatments. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England