COSMIN Methodology
Cross-source consensus on COSMIN Methodology from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The systematic review used PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- COSMIN methodology structured the review's quality assessment. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- The COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist assessed methodological quality across ten measurement-property domains. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Each measurement property was rated as sufficient, insufficient, or indeterminate. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Recommendation grades depended on content validity, internal consistency, and evidence for insufficient properties. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines