CPG Influence on Clinical Practice

Uses

Benefits

Comparisons

Highlighted claims

• 84.4% of participants reported that PIC CPGs had influenced their practice to a moderate or great extent. — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
• Residents and registrars reported the highest levels of CPG influence on their practice (94.3%), followed by nurses (92.6%). — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
• The three most common reasons for accessing PIC CPGs were validating treatment choices (78.5%), checking recommended investigations (69.9%), and teaching or supervising junior staff (64.4%). — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
• CPGs were seen as particularly valuable in preventing over-investigation and erroneous clinical intervention by less experienced doctors. — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
• Senior clinicians sometimes diverged from CPG recommendations based on longstanding personal experience, in contrast to junior staff who relied heavily on them. — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study