Cross-Site Validation
Cross-source consensus on Cross-Site Validation from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Benefits
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The protocol uses nested cross-validation to evaluate the complete modelling process. — Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol
- Models are trained on four sites and validated on the remaining site, repeated until every site has been held out once. — Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol
- The inner loop handles feature selection, hyperparameter tuning, threshold tuning, and model selection. — Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol
- The outer loop estimates performance on held-out external sites using leave-one-site-out cross-validation. — Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol
- Nested cross-validation with leave-one-site-out validation is presented as a strength because it provides repeated external validation and less biased performance estimates. — Development and cross-site validation of machine-learning models for diagnosis and prognosis of stable angina with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: a study protocol