Cultural Validity
Cross-source consensus on Cultural Validity from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The review aims to synthesize evidence on the cultural validity of mental health tools for refugees and asylum seekers. — Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- Cross-cultural adaptation evidence includes translation, conceptual equivalence, and cultural relevance. — Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- Tools developed in Western populations may miss culturally specific expressions of distress in refugees and asylum seekers. — Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- Western-validated instruments may be less culturally valid for people displaced by conflict or persecution. — Psychometric properties and cultural validity of mental health assessment tools for refugees and asylum seekers: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol