Cycling Intervention Evidence

Cross-source consensus on Cycling Intervention Evidence from 1 sources and 4 claims.

1 sources · 4 claims

Background

Before this protocol, Cycle Nation had not been tested in a fully powered randomised controlled trial or assessed for long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. — Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial
A prior Cycle Nation workplace pilot reported an average increase of 3.0 rides per week. — Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial
Previous cycling intervention studies often had small samples, short follow-up and limited economic evaluation. — Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial
The community-adapted version showed feasibility, acceptability and short-term effectiveness in Manchester and Glasgow. — Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 9 week multi-component cycling programme versus an existing single cycling training session: protocol for the Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial