De-implementation Outcomes
Cross-source consensus on De-implementation Outcomes from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- By February 2022, 6 of 12 evaluated interventions had significantly lower counts than expected compared with matched controls. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- Wave 2 of the EBI programme had mixed effects because reduced use occurred for some interventions but not others. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- Exercise ECG had the largest reduction among evaluated interventions. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- Kidney stone removal and upper GI endoscopy had higher-than-predicted counts by February 2022. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- Four interventions showed no statistically significant difference from expected counts. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England
- Forced reductions in elective care during COVID-19 did not automatically become sustained de-implementation. — De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England