Decision Aid Effects by Sex and Gender
Cross-source consensus on Decision Aid Effects by Sex and Gender from 1 sources and 7 claims.
1 sources · 7 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- Males/men receiving patient decision aids reported significantly less clinician-controlled decision making than females/women did. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
- Males/men receiving patient decision aids reported significantly higher patient-controlled decision making than females/women did. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
- Knowledge improved similarly for females/women and males/men receiving patient decision aids compared with usual care. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
- Decision regret did not differ significantly by sex or gender category. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
- Patient decision aids reduced feelings of being uninformed for both females/women and males/men, without a statistically significant between-category difference. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
- Patient decision aids improved clarity of values for both females/women and males/men, without a statistically significant between-category difference. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis
- Both females/women and males/men were less likely to remain undecided after patient decision aid use, with no statistically significant difference between categories. — Sex and gender reporting and differences in trials evaluating patient decision aids: a secondary analysis of systematic review with meta-analysis