Delirium Screening
Cross-source consensus on Delirium Screening from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Evidence quality
Other
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- Delirium identification relied mainly on clinical teams rather than systematic research-led screening, causing variability across sites. — Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK
- Several sites did not routinely apply the 4AT tool. — Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK
- Future randomized trials would need standardized delirium screening by research personnel at regular intervals. — Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK
- NICE recommends using the 4AT tool for all older inpatients on admission. — Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK
- Weak delirium screening infrastructure is a known issue in the UK and internationally. — Rehabilitation intervention to improve Recovery after an Episode of Delirium in adults over 65 years (RecoverED): a multicentre, single-arm feasibility study in NHS acute hospitals in the UK