Delivery Contexts
Cross-source consensus on Delivery Contexts from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Preparation
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- PROGROUP could tolerate variation in provider, location, and referral organisation if group identity formation and participation were protected. — Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme
- Not all influential contexts were under PROGROUP's control, including family support, social support, service capacity, and system overload. — Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme
- Venue, accessibility, travel burden, and transport support affected attendance and retention. — Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme
- Transport problems worsened attrition, while reimbursing travel costs helped retention and punctuality. — Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme
- Facilitators needed skill in managing group processes more often than additional diet or weight-management knowledge. — Logic model development through a feasibility RCT for a group-based weight management programme