Device-Based and Surgical Interventions

How it works

Benefits

Risks & contraindications

Comparisons

Highlighted claims

• Device-based and surgical approaches for HFpEF are heterogeneous. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
• CardioMEMS-type pulmonary artery pressure sensors provide continuous haemodynamic monitoring. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
• Transcatheter interatrial shunt devices aim to reduce left atrial pressure and improve exercise tolerance and prognosis. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
• Pacemaker implantation may raise exercise heart rate, but some studies suggest no exercise capacity benefit and possible increased adverse events. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
• Cardiac contractility modulation aims to enhance left ventricular contractility and has exploratory evidence of improved KCCQ scores and general health status. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials