Diabetes Inequity in FCV Settings
Cross-source consensus on Diabetes Inequity in FCV Settings from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Where it comes from
Other
Highlighted claims
- FCV countries consistently lagged behind non-FCV countries across several diabetes policy and service areas. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Ten of the 22 Eastern Mediterranean countries were classified as FCVs at the time of analysis. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Conflict and crises worsen diabetes outcomes by disrupting health facilities, supply chains, governance, workforce retention, financing, and data systems. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- The study focused on fragile, conflict-affected, and vulnerable settings because these countries face disrupted systems and constrained capacity. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region
- Emergencies can increase preventable diabetes complications and mortality when patients lose access to essential care inputs. — Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region