DS-RectFlow
Cross-source consensus on DS-RectFlow from 1 sources and 8 claims.
1 sources · 8 claims
Uses
How it works
Benefits
Dosage & preparation
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Once the coupling dataset is generated offline, DS-RectFlow inference uses plain Euler at zero added latency relative to vanilla RectFlow. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- DS-RectFlow suppresses divergence during offline coupling generation without changing the training loss, model architecture, or inference procedure. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- On CIFAR-10 with Euler-20, DS-RectFlow at NFE=1 (FID 12.03) outperforms vanilla RectFlow at every tested NFE including NFE=20 (FID 14.38). — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- The correction displaces each integration particle to a nearby candidate state with smaller estimated divergence before each Euler step, leaving the velocity field itself unmodified. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- Each corrected Euler step costs 81 model passes with m=n_h=8, applied only during offline coupling generation for the first fraction of integration steps. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- CIFAR-10 FID numbers are above state-of-the-art because the base model uses only 50,000 training iterations versus 400,000 used by Liu et al. (2023); the comparison is framed as isolating the correction's effect, not achieving peak absolute performance. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- For image generation, the zeroth-order correction evaluates eight Gaussian-perturbed candidate states per step and selects the one with minimum estimated divergence. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- The authors propose that DS-RectFlow should generalize to stochastic interpolants, optimal-transport flow matching, and score-based diffusion wherever divergent drift components degrade sample quality. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow