Eating Disorders
Cross-source consensus on Eating Disorders from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Evidence quality
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- Eating disorder status was assessed with the French version of the SCOFF questionnaire. — Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study
- A positive SCOFF result was treated as a screening result rather than a confirmed diagnosis. — Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study
- Eating disorder screening positivity without insulin omission was not associated with worse CGM metrics or HbA1c. — Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study
- The study recommends screening for eating disorders even without deterioration in CGM metrics or HbA1c. — Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study
- Eating disorder screening positivity was associated with higher diabetes distress even when glycaemic metrics were not worse. — Association of eating disorders and/or insulin omission with impaired glycaemic control in persons living with type 1 diabetes: cross-sectional analysis of the French SFDT1 study