ECRIN Clinical Research Metadata Repository
Cross-source consensus on ECRIN Clinical Research Metadata Repository from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Other
Highlighted claims
- An ECRIN MDR query identified 531 potential cross-registrations. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
- The ECRIN MDR aggregates cross-registry data via API. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
- The MDR captured 70 percent of potential cross-registrations found by the study approach that included non-resolving TRNs. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
- The MDR uniquely identified 20 additional cross-registrations not found by the study approach. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
- The MDR missed many cross-registrations linked via title matching or publication TRNs because those strategies were not used by MDR. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres