Emergency Department CPG Use

Cross-source consensus on Emergency Department CPG Use from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Uses

Clinicians in emergency settings were more likely to use CPGs at least weekly (69.7%) than those in non-emergency settings (58.2%). — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
Emergency setting clinicians relied especially heavily on shared devices to access CPGs (80.1% vs. 57.4% in non-emergency settings). — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
PIC CPGs were perceived as less practical in their current format for time-pressured environments such as emergency departments. — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
Some guidelines were described as too wordy and difficult to navigate on mobile devices during acute situations, with time-critical actions buried in surrounding detail. — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study
Emergency clinicians reason from presenting complaints rather than confirmed diagnoses, and premature diagnostic closure is a recognised source of clinical error. — Insights into clinician utilisation and perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative Clinical Practice Guidelines: a mixed-methods study