Empirical Calibration
Cross-source consensus on Empirical Calibration from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
How it works
Highlighted claims
- The study used 180 negative control outcomes to detect and correct for residual systematic error in hazard ratio estimates. — Lack of association between the brain penetrance of calcium channel blockers and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes: a retrospective, multidatabase cohort study
- Only empirically calibrated results were reported. — Lack of association between the brain penetrance of calcium channel blockers and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes: a retrospective, multidatabase cohort study
- Effect estimates from databases passing diagnostics were pooled using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with non-normal likelihood approximation to reduce bias from small event counts. — Lack of association between the brain penetrance of calcium channel blockers and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes: a retrospective, multidatabase cohort study
- Cox proportional hazards models conditioned on propensity score matching strata estimated calibrated hazard ratios, which were reported with 95% confidence intervals and p values. — Lack of association between the brain penetrance of calcium channel blockers and the incidence of neuropsychiatric outcomes: a retrospective, multidatabase cohort study