Engagement and Progression Criteria
Cross-source consensus on Engagement and Progression Criteria from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Dosage & preparation
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Progression criteria are feasibility thresholds rather than clinical success criteria or claims about treatment effectiveness. — Cognitive–behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
- In this trial, an engaged user is defined as completing at least two lessons and two sessions during the six-week app-use period. — Cognitive–behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
- The protocol says progression thresholds should be interpreted as context-specific guidance rather than rigid rules. — Cognitive–behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
- There are no universal engagement benchmarks for mental health apps. — Cognitive–behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
- Real-world engagement with digital self-help interventions varies widely, with 21% to 88% of users achieving minimal engagement in one systematic review. — Cognitive–behavioural therapy smartphone app for low mood and worry management in female armed forces veterans in Great Britain: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial