Epiphenomenon

Cross-source consensus on Epiphenomenon from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

How it works

In hospitalised populations, pericardial disease often functions as a marker of underlying disease severity rather than an isolated disease process. — Prognosis of patients hospitalised with primary or secondary pericardial disease: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study
The high full-cohort mortality is attributed primarily to the secondary-diagnosis subgroup, where pericardial involvement signals a more lethal underlying process. — Prognosis of patients hospitalised with primary or secondary pericardial disease: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study
Pericardial disease may be the first clinical manifestation of previously undetected malignancy. — Prognosis of patients hospitalised with primary or secondary pericardial disease: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study
Evidence does not support pericardial disease as a prognostic marker in myocardial infarction or lupus. — Prognosis of patients hospitalised with primary or secondary pericardial disease: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study
Pericardial disease may precede formal diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease by years. — Prognosis of patients hospitalised with primary or secondary pericardial disease: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study