EQ-5D Value Sets
Cross-source consensus on EQ-5D Value Sets from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Tanzania did not have its own EQ-5D value set, so the study used Uganda for the base case and Ethiopia for sensitivity analysis. — How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey
- The absence of a Tanzanian EQ-5D value set was a key limitation of the study. — How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey
- Utility scores depend on the value set because value sets encode population preferences about health dimensions. — How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey
- Ugandan and Ethiopian tariffs produced different absolute scores and dimension weights. — How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey
- The Ugandan tariff produced a larger estimated utility loss because pain and discomfort were prominent and heavily weighted. — How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey
- International health economic studies should use country-specific value sets where possible. — How do musculoskeletal disorders impact on quality of life in Tanzania? Results from a community-based survey