Evaluation Design
Cross-source consensus on Evaluation Design from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The evaluation used mixed methods including service mapping, interviews, surveys, clinical outcome analysis, and health economic analysis. — Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation
- The evaluation examined five new T1DE services and three existing services. — Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation
- Health outcomes were reported at baseline and 6 months without significance testing or confidence intervals. — Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation
- The evaluation could not determine clinical or cost-effectiveness because it lacked a comparison group and had small follow-up numbers. — Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation
- The health economic analysis used cost-consequence analysis from the NHS health system perspective. — Delivering integrated diabetes and mental healthcare for people with type 1 diabetes disordered eating (T1DE): a mixed methods evaluation