Evidence Appraisal and Synthesis
Cross-source consensus on Evidence Appraisal and Synthesis from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Preparation
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Heterogeneity will be assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the I² index. — Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025
- Methodological quality will be assessed using AMSTAR. — Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025
- AMSTAR scores of 8 to 11 are high quality, 4 to 7 are moderate quality and below 4 are low quality. — Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025
- Publication bias and small-study effects will be assessed using funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s regression test. — Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025
- The overall strength and quality of evidence will be evaluated using GRADE following Cochrane recommendations. — Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025
- Quantitative analysis will be performed in STATA version 17, and pooled effect estimates will be presented with 95% confidence intervals. — Hepatitis B virus infection and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia: protocol for umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis 2025