Evidence-based Intrapartum Care
Cross-source consensus on Evidence-based Intrapartum Care from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The study used WHO recommendations for high-quality intrapartum care as the benchmark for evidence-based practice. — Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka
- WHO-recommended intrapartum care includes practices that support physiological birth and respectful, informed maternity care. — Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka
- WHO discourages routine use of continuous CTG, routine amniotomy, fundal pressure, and routine episiotomy. — Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka
- Routine use of certain intrapartum interventions may be harmful or ineffective when they are not clinically indicated. — Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka
- Evidence-based intrapartum care can reduce maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. — Barriers to integrating evidence-based practices into intrapartum care during vaginal births: a descriptive qualitative study in Sri Lanka