Fatty Liver Index
Cross-source consensus on Fatty Liver Index from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- FLI had the best overall predictive performance across NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- FLI achieved AUROC values above 0.8 for all three diagnostic frameworks. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- FLI had the highest negative predictive value across all three definitions. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- FLI performed best in females in sex-stratified analyses. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- FLI's clinical practicality is limited because it requires GGT, which is not always included in general physical examinations. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study