Feasibility Evidence
Cross-source consensus on Feasibility Evidence from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The study used a single-arm, non-randomised, prospective mixed-methods feasibility design. — Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study
- The evaluation was guided by the RE-AIM framework. — Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study
- The study supports feasibility claims but not efficacy claims because it lacked randomisation, a control group and long follow-up. — Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study
- The study supports a tiered implementation strategy tailored to palliative medicine, oncology and outpatient cardiology. — Adapting and implementing the Serious Illness Care Programme for outpatient oncology, cardiology and palliative medicine clinics: a mixed-methods feasibility study