Feedback Design
Cross-source consensus on Feedback Design from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
How it works
Benefits
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- From the second round onward, feedback included each participant’s prior response, aggregated group judgments, and summarized open-text arguments. — Participants’ experiences with the Delphi method: an online evaluation of a three-round Delphi across German-speaking countries
- Participants were informed when judgments differed significantly by disciplinary background. — Participants’ experiences with the Delphi method: an online evaluation of a three-round Delphi across German-speaking countries
- Most experts who had experienced feedback could extract important information from graphical displays. — Participants’ experiences with the Delphi method: an online evaluation of a three-round Delphi across German-speaking countries
- Only about half of participants considered statistical results and summarized open-text arguments when responding in later rounds. — Participants’ experiences with the Delphi method: an online evaluation of a three-round Delphi across German-speaking countries
- The study could not confirm why many experts did not actively incorporate feedback, but it treats feedback design as needing further empirical investigation. — Participants’ experiences with the Delphi method: an online evaluation of a three-round Delphi across German-speaking countries