Fetal heart rate monitoring

Cross-source consensus on Fetal heart rate monitoring from 1 sources and 6 claims.

1 sources · 6 claims

Uses

Comparisons

Evidence quality

Other

Highlighted claims

The study assessed FHR throughout labour using intermittent auscultation with a Pinard fetoscope. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
The study used intermittent auscultation rather than continuous electronic fetal monitoring. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
The WHO recommends periodic auscultation as the standard during normal labour. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
The primary aim of intrapartum monitoring is to identify metabolic acidosis early enough to intervene before tissue damage occurs. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
NICE guidelines state that abnormal intrapartum FHR findings should trigger escalation to obstetrician-led care. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
The article presents the study's narrower case definition as a possible reason for underestimating NRFHRP prevalence compared with broader electronic monitoring criteria. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study