FRAM Reporting Completeness

Cross-source consensus on FRAM Reporting Completeness from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Comparisons

Only 20 of 68 healthcare FRAM studies (29%) reported at least one aspect of all four steps. — Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data
Twenty-eight studies (41%) described Step 4 consequences, with proposed process improvements as the near-universal focus. — Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data
The low rate of full-step reporting likely reflects that healthcare FRAM studies more often aim to understand a process than to quantify and manage variability. — Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data
FRAM studies in healthcare complete Steps 3 and 4 less often than FRAM studies in other domains. — Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data
The fact that FRAM studies in healthcare are often led by clinical staff rather than safety scientists is proposed as a contributing explanation for incomplete step reporting. — Building a functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in healthcare: a systematic review on how steps are reported, defined and supported by data