Funder Websites
Cross-source consensus on Funder Websites from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- Most global health funder websites lacked essential metadata needed for automated transparency tracking. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement
- The funder website sample was excluded because too few relevant trials remained after date criteria were applied. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement
- Only the Fogarty International Center at the NIH had explicit global health programmes with enough metadata to track clinical trials. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement
- The funder website channel remained unvalidated because its data was insufficient for analysis. — Towards monitoring of global health research: an exploratory analysis of transparency and stakeholder engagement