Generative AI Chatbots
Cross-source consensus on Generative AI Chatbots from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Comparisons
Where it comes from
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- The study audited five widely available generative AI chatbots on everyday health and medical questions. — Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit
- Prompting produced 250 total chatbot responses across five models and 50 prompts. — Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit
- The audited chatbots were treated as closed or proprietary deployments because their model weights and training data were unavailable. — Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit
- Free public versions were selected because the study aimed to test versions likely to be used by the general public. — Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit
- Chatbots often answered confidently and with certainty across the response set. — Generative artificial intelligence-driven chatbots and medical misinformation: an accuracy, referencing and readability audit