Harm Reduction Policy
Cross-source consensus on Harm Reduction Policy from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Virtual overdose response services are not an ideal replacement for in-person supervised consumption sites. — Cost-effectiveness analysis of Canada’s National Overdose Response Service
- Supervised consumption sites have strong evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, but remain politically contested. — Cost-effectiveness analysis of Canada’s National Overdose Response Service
- Expansion of NORS could reach more Canadians who use substances and do not access existing harm reduction programmes. — Cost-effectiveness analysis of Canada’s National Overdose Response Service
- Conservative estimates suggest up to 100,000 Canadians who use substances may not access existing harm reduction programmes. — Cost-effectiveness analysis of Canada’s National Overdose Response Service