Healthcare System Resilience
Cross-source consensus on Healthcare System Resilience from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The study identified six resilience dimensions from the literature and validated them through survey and focus group data. — Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study
- Across the six resilience dimensions, 17 subdimensions and 39 concrete recommended actions were identified. — Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study
- Pre-existing pandemic protocols were often absent or not operationalised, which was a recurring finding across settings. — Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study
- Simulation exercises were recommended as essential tools for translating governance plans into operational reality. — Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study
- Trust among professionals in their organisation's preparedness was identified as a prerequisite for coordinated crisis response. — Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study
- Communication with patients and the public should be treated as a standardised protocol applicable to any type of crisis, not improvised. — Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: a mixed-methods study