Heterogeneity and inconsistency
Cross-source consensus on Heterogeneity and inconsistency from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- Heterogeneity will be assessed with I-squared statistics using Cochrane guidance. — Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Global inconsistency will be assessed by comparing consistency and inconsistency models. — Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Local inconsistency will be assessed with node-splitting and loop-specific methods. — Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Transitivity may be violated if treatment indications differ or effect modifiers are unevenly distributed. — Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Potential effect modifiers include publication year, patient characteristics, and intervention characteristics. — Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments in post-stroke depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis