HIRA Quality Assessment Programme
Cross-source consensus on HIRA Quality Assessment Programme from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Background
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- HIRA conducted nine quality assessment waves from 2007 to 2020, four of which included elective spinal surgeries. — Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis
- The study was a nationwide retrospective cohort using HIRA quality assessment data linked to national health insurance claims data. — Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis
- The ninth QA wave changed prophylaxis from a flexible policy to a uniform, narrow, and time-limited approach compared with earlier waves. — Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis
- The Korean QA system applied standardised prophylaxis rules without accounting for individual patient risk variables. — Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis
- Tertiary hospitals had the highest compliance with antibiotic guidelines yet also had the highest adjusted SSI risk, creating a paradox explained by their more complex and sicker patient populations. — Impact of restricted prophylactic antibiotic guidelines on surgical site infection rates following spinal surgery in Korea: a nationwide cohort analysis